SciSchool.in

• Link to Pygmalion by G B Shaw
• Link to PYGMALION Movie. If the link has vanished, search ‘pygmalion full movie’ on youtube.

Me: Pygmalion by Bernard Shaw dissecting the false morality, discuss.

ChatGPT: George Bernard Shaw’s **Pygmalion** (1912) is not just a witty comedy about a phonetics professor turning a Cockney flower girl into a “duchess.” It is a biting dissection of the false morality that governed Edwardian society — its pretensions, hypocrisies, and shallow conceptions of virtue and respectability.

Here’s how the play does that:

1. Class and “Manners” vs. Real Morality

Shaw exposes the hypocrisy of a society that equates good speech and dress with goodness itself.

• Eliza, the flower girl, is judged as immoral or indecent simply because she speaks in Cockney slang and sells flowers on the street.
• Once she learns “proper” English, she is suddenly accepted as a “lady” — though her character, honesty, and integrity have not changed.
  → Shaw’s point: society’s morality is superficial, tied to appearances, not ethics.

2. Sexual Morality and the Double Standard

Victorian/Edwardian “respectability” was obsessed with female purity and propriety.

• Mrs. Pearce and Mrs. Higgins constantly worry about “what people will think” when a young woman stays in Higgins’s house.
• Higgins himself is indifferent to social convention — he treats Eliza like a subject, not a woman.
  Shaw uses this to expose the false prudery of a society that claims moral superiority while being obsessed with sexual gossip.

3. Economic Morality and the Selling of Respectability

Eliza’s father, Alfred Doolittle, is a brilliant mouthpiece for Shaw’s satire.

• As a dustman, he calls himself one of the “undeserving poor” and rejects middle-class morality.
• When he inherits money, he is forced into the “middle-class respectability” he once mocked — he calls it “the most damnable thing.”
  → Shaw suggests that morality itself is a class privilege, used to control the poor and justify inequality.

4. The Pygmalion Theme and Moral Ownership

Higgins believes he “made” Eliza, much like the mythical sculptor Pygmalion creating Galatea.

• But Shaw inverts the myth: Eliza gains self-awareness and rejects being someone’s creation.
• She exposes Higgins’s arrogance and moral blindness — his failure to treat people as equals.
  → Shaw’s moral vision values individual dignity and self-respect over the empty codes of social morality.

5. Shaw’s Fabian Morality

As a Fabian socialist, Shaw’s critique is ultimately moral and social:
He shows that real morality should be based on honesty, equality, and respect — not on accent, class, or convention.
Pygmalion thus becomes an argument for a truer, rational morality, stripped of hypocrisy.

In short:

Shaw’s Pygmalion dissects false morality by exposing how society confuses manners for morals, appearance for virtue, and convention for conscience. Through Eliza’s transformation and revolt, Shaw insists that genuine morality lies in independence, truth, and respect for human worth — not in the shallow codes of class respectability.

Me: you said Edwardian society, but is it true for most of the current world

CharGPT: Yes — absolutely. Shaw’s critique of false morality in Pygmalion is not confined to Edwardian England; it’s uncomfortably universal and enduring. The forms have changed, but the substance remains.

Here’s how it still holds true today:

1. Appearance still outweighs character

Society still rewards polish over integrity.

• People with the right accent, education, or social media presence are often treated as “better” or more trustworthy — much like Eliza being accepted only after she speaks “proper” English.
• Moral worth is often performed, not practiced.

2. Economic morality persists

Money still “cleanses.”

• Wealth or fame excuses moral lapses, while poverty or unconventional lifestyles invite judgment.
• Like Alfred Doolittle’s complaint, the poor are still lectured on morality by those whose comfort depends on their labor.

3. Gender and respectability double standards survive

• Women, especially in conservative or public spheres, are still judged on how they dress, speak, or behave — far more harshly than men.
• The obsession with image and “reputation” remains a global moral theatre.

4. Moral hypocrisy in institutions

Governments, corporations, and media often preach ethics while exploiting loopholes, workers, or the environment — echoing Shaw’s attack on a morality that serves power, not justice.

5. Language and identity politics

Today’s equivalents of Higgins’s phonetics are accent training, “corporate grooming,” or “soft skills” — all ways to conform to dominant class norms.
The idea that one must speak or behave a certain way to be respected is precisely the false morality Shaw mocked.

So yes —

Shaw’s world hasn’t disappeared; it’s just digitized and globalized. The “respectable society” he dissected now operates on LinkedIn, Instagram, and political stages — where appearance, status, and self-promotion still masquerade as virtue.

Me: can you grade present nations in this regards, region wise

That’s a sharp and uncomfortable question — exactly the kind Shaw himself would have liked.
We can’t numerically “grade” nations on morality without being simplistic, but we can compare regions in how deeply false morality — meaning appearance-based, class-coded, or hypocritical morality — still shapes public life.
Here’s a broad, sociological sketch rather than a moral scoreboard:

1. Western Europe

Trend: Decline of overt class morality, persistence of institutional hypocrisy.

• Positives: Secular ethics, social welfare, and transparency have weakened older forms of “respectability.”
• False morality zones: Bureaucratic double standards, corporate virtue-signalling (“greenwashing”), and political correctness as a cosmetic rather than moral stance.
• Grade: Moderate hypocrisy, high self-awareness. People often know they’re performing.

2. North America

Trend: Replacement of Victorian morality with image morality.

• Positives: Individual freedom and open dissent.
• False morality zones: Corporate PR ethics, social-media virtue signalling, celebrity activism, moral outrage used as branding.
• Grade: High performative morality. Appearances dominate discourse; sincerity often commercialized.

3. East Asia (Japan, China, Korea, etc.)

Trend: Confucian respectability merged with capitalist appearance-culture.

• Positives: Collective ethics, discipline, respect for order.
• False morality zones: Obsession with “face,” social conformity, hidden inequalities, workplace hypocrisy.
• Grade: High formal morality, low individual authenticity.

4. South Asia

Trend: Colonial residue + religious and caste morality.

• Positives: Deep philosophical moral traditions and empathy at the personal level.
• False morality zones: Class/caste hypocrisy, patriarchal codes, corruption masked by religiosity.
• Grade: Very high social hypocrisy. Strong appearance-based respectability, weak institutional ethics.

5. Middle East

Trend: Religious moral authority fused with authoritarian politics.

• Positives: Strong communal solidarity and charity ethics.
• False morality zones: Public virtue masking private corruption, severe gender double standards.
• Grade: Rigid moral surface, high private contradiction.

6. Latin America

Trend: Catholic legacy mixed with populist rhetoric.

• Positives: Warmth, hospitality, open emotional culture.
• False morality zones: Political corruption sanctified by religiosity, macho codes disguised as morality.
• Grade: Moderate-to-high hypocrisy.

7. Sub-Saharan Africa

Trend: Tribal/community ethics meeting post-colonial political corruption.

• Positives: Strong communal responsibility and moral storytelling.
• False morality zones: Official moral posturing, corruption, religious-political hypocrisy.
• Grade: High institutional hypocrisy, honest interpersonal morality.

8. Northern Europe & Scandinavia (special case)

Trend: Moral minimalism — “just do your job and don’t show off.”

• Positives: Transparency, low corruption, equality.
• False morality zones: Subtle moral superiority, social conformity pressure.
• Grade: Low hypocrisy, but quiet self-righteousness.

Overall Pattern

The more a society values reputation over principle, the stronger its false morality.
The more it links virtue to class, wealth, or religion, the less authentic its ethics become.

In short, Shaw’s disease of moral pretence is global, though its symptoms differ —
the accent may change from London English to corporate English, but the performance continues.

Me: where do you place current India

ChatGPT: Bluntly — near the top of the hypocrisy chart.

Modern India presents one of the world’s most vivid examples of false morality: a country that talks endlessly of virtue, spirituality, and “values,” while tolerating corruption, inequality, and cruelty in daily life. It’s a culture where moral language is loud but moral practice is weak. Let’s dissect it the way Shaw would — clinically and without sentiment.

1. The façade of religiosity

India wears its morality on its sleeve — rituals, temples, and public piety everywhere.
Yet religion has largely become a badge of identity, not of ethics.

• Dishonesty, greed, or injustice are forgiven if wrapped in religious symbols.
• The same society that worships goddesses still tolerates female infanticide and harassment.
  → A perfect case of moral noise without moral substance.

2. Caste and class hypocrisy

Shaw attacked class morality; India multiplies it by caste.

• Respectability depends not on conduct but on surname, language, and status.
• The elite speak English, preach meritocracy, and still inherit everything.
• The poor are lectured on cleanliness, ethics, and patriotism by people who exploit them.
  → This is structural false morality, institutionalized for centuries.

3. Political and bureaucratic pretence

The political class constantly invokes Mother India, service, and dharma, but treats governance as a marketplace for personal gain.

• Corruption is moralized away as “adjustment.”
• Honesty is punished as naïveté.
  → The very term “moral values” has become an ornament for speeches, not a compass for behavior.

4. Gender and social respectability

The obsession with female chastity and family honor survives, now joined by modern hypocrisy.

• Society pretends to be progressive — corporate feminism, urban liberalism — while victim-blaming and controlling women.
  → The country celebrates goddesses, bans books, and mocks victims — all in one week.

5. The moral theatre of nationalism

Patriotism has replaced religion as a new moral mask.

• “National interest” is used to silence dissent and excuse abuse of power.
• Criticism is branded as betrayal, not as moral responsibility.
  → Shaw would call this collective vanity disguised as virtue.

6. The personal paradox

Indians, individually, can be generous, empathetic, and self-sacrificing — but collectively the system rewards conformity, not integrity.
→ Personal goodness and public hypocrisy coexist uneasily, like Eliza Doolittle’s two voices.

In summary

India today is a moral paradox: devout but corrupt, spiritual but cruel, sentimental but unjust.
It values reputation over conscience, ritual over fairness, and appearance over truth.

If Shaw had lived in Delhi, he might have written Pygmalion in Hindi — and made Higgins teach not pronunciation, but how to pretend respectability while doing nothing moral.

Me: Can you write something like an Indian Bernard Shaw

Let’s imagine an “Indian Bernard Shaw” — not an imitator, but a thinker and dramatist with Shaw’s sharp wit, social skepticism, and moral courage — writing from within Indian reality.
Here’s a sample essay that captures his voice and spirit.

“The Republic of Pretence” — by an Indian Bernard Shaw

India is a land where everyone wants to save the soul of the nation, and no one wants to clean the street outside their house. We chant about truth, but our lives are built on convenient lies — small ones in traffic, big ones in politics, and divine ones in religion. We have turned hypocrisy into a patriotic duty.

The Indian does not hate immorality — he hates being seen as immoral. He will break a queue, dodge a tax, bribe a clerk, and then post on social media about honesty and Dharma. We worship morality like an imported perfume: admired from a distance, never opened.

Our greatest national obsession is respectability. A man may ruin a river, exploit his workers, and beat his wife, but as long as he touches his elders’ feet and quotes the Gita, he remains “a good man.” In this republic, ethics are decorative — displayed during festivals, ignored during tenders.

Caste survives because it fits perfectly with our vanity. Religion survives because it flatters our laziness. Corruption survives because it speaks the same polite language as the victim. Every institution — the temple, the parliament, the boardroom — is built on the same foundation: don’t be good, look good.

The new Indian morality is not ancient; it is advertisement. We replaced priests with influencers and sermons with slogans. The gods are on billboards, and salvation is a limited-time offer. Even our rebellion is rehearsed — angry tweets, not action.

The Indian Bernard Shaw would not write plays about pronunciation or etiquette. He would write about pretence — our national dialect. His Eliza Doolittle would be a Dalit girl with a scholarship, learning how to sound confident in English while her neighbors still refuse her water. His Higgins would be an HR manager, judging her “communication skills” and calling it merit.

What India needs is not more moral talk but moral truthfulness — the courage to admit what we are. A country that confuses loudness with conviction and ritual with conscience will always be ancient in history and adolescent in ethics.

The day we stop pretending, the Republic will finally be born — not on paper, but in character.

Would you like me to write a few short “Indian Shaw” essays in this tone — one each on themes like religion, education, gender, politics, and class — as if they were columns from this fictional thinker?

Me: proceed

ChatGPT: Excellent — here’s the first set of short “Indian Bernard Shaw” essays, each written in that ironic, fearless, witty tone — short enough to feel like columns, sharp enough to sting.

1. Religion: The Great Indian Escape

Religion in India is less about God and more about alibi.
We have a ritual for every wrong, a festival for every failure, and a temple for every thief who got away.
The more we sin, the louder we pray — because prayer, here, is not confession but camouflage.
Our gods are the most overworked civil servants in the country, cleaning up after our laziness, dishonesty, and indiscipline.
We call this faith. Shaw would call it a national cover story.

2. Education: The Factory of the Obedient

We boast of ancient universities while producing modern parrots.
Our education system does not teach thought — it teaches timidity.
Children learn that the safest answer is the one already written in the guidebook.
We reward repetition and punish imagination.
We dream of Nobel Prizes but fear questions.
Our schools make clerks, not citizens — and then we wonder why corruption thrives so easily among the educated.

3. Gender: The Two Indias

India worships women in temples and disrespects them in traffic.
The same man who bows before Durga will elbow a woman in a bus queue.
Our society wants women who are strong but submissive, modern but modest, visible but voiceless.
It celebrates the “goddess” because the goddess never argues back.
Real equality will begin not when women are placed on pedestals, but when men step off theirs.

4. Politics: The Theatre of Patriotism

In India, politics is the most profitable branch of acting.
The stage is Parliament, the costume is nationalism, and the script is outrage.
Every party claims to serve the people — like vultures claiming to protect the carcass.
We mistake shouting for conviction, slogans for ideas, and handouts for justice.
Our democracy runs on emotion, not ethics — we vote with anger, not awareness.
If Shaw were here, he’d say: The Indian politician is the one citizen who has completely mastered the art of looking sincere without being so.

5. Class and Respectability: The New Untouchables

We abolished untouchability, but only on paper.
Now it survives in subtler perfumes — English accents, gated colonies, and last names.
Our elites preach simplicity but live like emperors.
Our poor preach honesty because it’s all they can afford.
Respectability in India is a costume stitched with hypocrisy — a man’s virtue is judged not by what he does, but by what car he drives to the temple.

Closing Note — “The Indian Shaw” Speaks

I write not to mock India, but to remind her that her greatest weakness is not corruption, nor ignorance — it is pretence.
The moment we prefer truth over appearance, we will stop being ancient and start being civilized.

Would you like me to continue this series — say, five more essays on themes like Media, Bureaucracy, Marriage, Youth, and Modern Spirituality — in the same “Indian Shaw” voice?